ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION@#Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is an increasingly common treatment option for acute kidney injury (AKI) patients, but there are few studies examining the survival and predictive outcome of this therapy. The study aims to evaluate survival, pre-SLED predictors and complications associated with SLED.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#This was a retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with AKI treated with SLED in a tertiary hospital from January 2014 to August 2018. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were the clinical and laboratory pre-SLED characteristics that were associated with survival and complication of SLED.@*RESULTS@#Median survival of AKI patients treated with SLED was 17 days and the 30-day mortality rate was 58%. Pre-SLED serum levels of creatinine (adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94), albumin (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.4-0.81), potassium (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.1-1.73) and number of SLED (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-1) served as predictors of survival. Arrhythmia was found 3.3% and intradialytic hypotension in 13.2% of patients. No patient had bleeding complications.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Our study found similar in-hospital and 30-day mortality for AKI patients treated with SLED. High pre-SLED levels of serum albumin, creatinine and number of SLED were significantly associated with reduced risk of death and high pre-SLED serum potassium was associated with increased risk of death. These results indicate that SLED is safe treatment, with few haemorrhage and haemodynamic complications.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of early restenosis of central veins in hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (9 men and 7 women; mean age 65.8 ± 14.4 years; range, 40–82 years) with 16 episodes of early restenoses of central veins within 3 months (median patency duration 2.5 months) were enrolled from January 2014 to June 2015. Ten native central veins and 6 intra-stent central veins were treated with double paclitaxel-coated balloons (diameter 6–7 mm) plus a high pressure balloon (diameter 12–14 mm). The study outcomes included procedural success (< 30% residual stenosis) and primary patency of the treated lesion (< 50% angiographic stenosis without re-intervention). RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in all 16 cases of central vein stenoses. The mean diameter of the central vein was 3.7 ± 2.4 mm before the procedure vs. 11.4 ± 1.8 mm after the initial procedure. There were no procedure-related complications. The mean diameters of the central veins at 6 months and 12 months were 7.8 ± 1.3 mm and 6.9 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The primary patency rates at 6 months and 12 months were 93.8% and 31.2%, respectively. One patient had significant restenosis of the central vein at 3 months. The median primary patency period was 9 months for paclitaxel-coated balloons and 2.5 months for the last previous procedure with conventional balloons (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our limited study, paclitaxel-coated balloons seem to improve the patency rate in cases of early restenosis of central veins. However, a further randomized control trial is necessary.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Angioplasty , Angioplasty, Balloon , Constriction, Pathologic , Renal Dialysis , VeinsABSTRACT
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The key to treatment of a thrombosed dialysis graft is restoration and maintenance of function as long as possible. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy in the treatment of thrombosed haemodialysis grafts.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>During a 3-year period, 108 patients with 114 thrombosed dialysis grafts were referred to our institute for treatment. Fifty thrombosed dialysis grafts underwent pulse-spray catheter thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) with angioplasty, and 64 thrombosed dialysis grafts underwent surgical thrombectomy. The procedural success rates, complications and average patency times and patency rates were compared between the 2 procedures. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no statistically significant differences between the pharmacomechanical thrombolysis group and the thrombectomy group in the procedural success rates (94% and 93.8%, P = 0.15) or average patency times (6.24 months and 6.30 months, P = 0.17). The primary and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 28.0% ± 8.4% and 54.3% ± 7.8% for the thrombolysis with angioplasty group, and 30.0% ± 6.3% and 57.0% ± 4.8% for the thrombectomy group, respectively (P = 0.65 and P = 0.49, respectively). There were no procedural-related major complications.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our study found no differences in outcomes between patients treated with pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy for thrombosed haemodialysis grafts. Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis can be considered as an alternative treatment for dialysis graft thrombosis.</p>